China’s infrastructure investment as a development strategy
GPS’s 21st Century China Center welcomed Francis Fukuyama for its seventh annual Sokwanlok Distinguish Lecture Series
| By Rachel Hommel | GPS News
Held Jan. 29, the 2018 Sokwanlok Distinguish Lecture Series was presented by Francis Fukuyama, who has written widely on issues in development and international politics. His research has been fundamental in Chinese policy, reaching deep into the body of collective wisdom in 21st century politics.
Hosted by the 21st Century China Center at the UC San Diego School of Global Policy and Strategy (GPS), the standing room only event honors the ongoing contributions of center founders Marion and Kwan So who established this series as an avenue to foster greater U.S. and China understanding by bringing international thought leaders to campus.
GPS Professor Barry Naughton, who holds the Sokwanlok Chair of Chinese International Affairs, applauded Fukuyama’s fearless spirit and front-line insights into China’s infrastructure trends and policy.
“He is a genuine public intellectual and somebody who reaches deep into the body of collective wisdom,” said Naughton. “He produces idea, thoughts and insights that can reach out to millions of people and give them a deeper and more sophisticated interpretation of public affairs.”
China’s Growth of Infrastructure
Discussing China’s model of state-led development, Fukuyama showcased how China over the years has engaged heavily on infrastructure investment, which is the base for the “One Belt, One Road” initiative — a development strategy proposed by the Chinese government that addresses connectivity and cooperation between Eurasian countries.
Unlike Western development funding, which has increasingly focused on issues like public health, good governance, anti-corruption and women’s empowerment, China’s domestic development has been fueled by high levels of infrastructure investment such as building roads, bridges and airports.
“No country has ever gotten rich by just investing in public health,” said Fukuyama. “Infrastructure is desperately needed – people want roads, electricity and this is not being met by Western agencies.”
Drivers of Development Trends
Fukuyama offers three factors in the growth of the Chinese infrastructure investment. First, in China, there is an authoritarian advantage, resulting in the need for less consultation, allowing projects to be completed more rapidly. Second, geopolitical positioning has become a main driver for these projects, with foreign policy goals weighing in the investment decision. And third, within domestic industrial policy there is a strong need to maintain spending to keep Chinese people employed.
“One of the mysteries is how these decisions and tradeoffs are being made,” said Fukuyama. “China’s banks are not designed as loss leaders or aid institutions.”
Looking at over 20 case studies in his research, Fukuyama examines several studies where U.S. and China were both building and competing in a region, exploring commercial (Western) vs. relational (Chinese) justification for project selection.
In the case of Jamaica, the highway project aimed to connect the capital with the main tourism areas, we see that the Chinese wanted to build influence in the Caribbean.
“China knew they were going to lose money but it was a way of showing their flag in an area that was traditionally part of the American sphere of influence,” said Fukuyama. “They compensated to stay in the game.”
By contrast, Fukuyama highlighted a Western project, Power Africa, a U.S. government-led partnership under the Obama administration. The initiative indicated that African states did not want health programs as much as they wanted electricity, a single item repeatedly stressed, with a goal of 20,000 megawatts of new clean power generation by 2020.
Unlike the Chinese, which have invested $60-70 billion dollars in other projects in Sub-Saharan Africa in the past decade, the U.S. invested $0 in Power Africa, even with the backing of President Obama. They became dependent on mobilizing private sector resources to fund the project.
“These kinds of issues in the U.S. are extremely hard to coordinate, especially with 12 agencies required to make it work,” said Fukuyama. “The U.S. has not delivered on any projects, it’s quite a contrast to China.”
Rather than looking at the frameworks of approaches as either transactional (Western) or relational (Eastern), Fukuyama examines rates of return. Because the Chinese overemphasize the positive and undervalue negative, their approach tends to work less well outside of China.
Whereas internal rates of return estimate future cash flows after interest, salary and cost of construction, infrastructure development rarely captures an external rate of return, or whether benefits flow to the broader society.
“Most infrastructure projects anywhere in the world do not justify complete private sector funding because they won’t make money,” said Fukuyama. “You can make money on airports, toll roads, electricity and utilities but most infrastructure projects are really public goods.”
Fukuyama concludes that neither side’s approach to infrastructure investment is the gold standard. The West has too many safeguards, which leads to project lags and increased costs. China lays out too much capital, with limited awareness of financial risk. With tensions created by both approaches, Fukuyama encourages changing behaviors.
“This is not a well-oiled machine. Our failure to do infrastructure projects is a microcosm of our larger democratic political problem,” said Fukuyama. “I’ve coined the term ‘vetocracy’ or rule by veto. In the American political system, we have overdone it.”
- Is the MPP the right degree for me?
- Through knowledge we gain understanding
- Mapping a cleaner San Diego
- A day in the life of a NCAA Woman of the Year Honoree
- Nirupama Rao defines the future of Indo-Pacific relations
- Winter reading for the bibliophile
- Alumni nominated spotlight: Booz Allen Hamilton consultant Maura Deignan
- Leading from the front
- Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies expands research on drug war and migrant crisis
- A marriage of policy and advocacy
- Decarbonizing the grid
- Sylff Fellows translate vision into reality
- Stanford study finds poor air quality responsible for one in five infant deaths in sub‑Saharan Africa
- Office hours: Associate Professor Jennifer Burney
- Class of 2018 graduates embody global citizenry and leadership
- Science Policy Fellows program nurtures effective interdisciplinary scholars
- Building cross-border relationships
- Geoengineering a greener future
- Sponsored Student Spotlight: Adnan Saygili
- Celebrating academic excellence
- Painting the picture of an MPP student’s day
- Gregory Lee looks at the future of digital health and technology
- A sustainable seafood hero
- Pass the pen: Alumnae nominated spotlight
- Campus recognizes alumni as leaders and changemakers
- Innovation in mobile technology
- Ian Johnson chronicles the rise of religion in China
- Writing the book on China’s economic policy
- Broadening horizons through international experience at BCG
- Office hours: Professor Gordon McCord
- New evening option for working professionals
- China's infrastructure investment as a development strategy
- Rethinking the war on drugs in Mexico
- Creating theoretical frameworks
- Nurturing future leaders at TechPolis
- The future is female
- Jamal Russell Black on Veridian Analytics' entrepreneurial spirit
- Love is in the air
- A day in the life of an MCEPA student
- Health and human capital
- Eduardo Porter finds journalistic inspiration at GPS
- Technology assessment at the nexus of STEM and policy
- IGCC receives coveted UC research grant
- Battery storage at the center of energy policy
- Researching how humans and the environment interact
- Office hours: Professor Ulrike Schaede
- Fighting wildfires with web based imagery
- United we dream
- Our 2017-2018 Boren Fellows
- Applying game theory to study behaviors
- Students craft views on climate change at COP23
- Molding future technical experts
- Why GPS: A niche in life
- The art of entrepreneurship
- Solar energy and pursuing the policy dream
- Social entrepreneur and first time author Ken Davenport ’90 of “The Two Gates”
- Why GPS: Discovering a passion for all things math
- Our 2017-18 Dean’s Fellows
- A Living, Learning Laboratory
- A ‘Prep Program’ for success, before day one
- Office hours: Professor Gordon Hanson
- Adding to a truly interdisciplinary academic environment
- Why GPS: Apply now and figure it out later
- Sponsored Student Spotlight: Noritoshi Kurokawa
- West Coast-Trained for a Washington, D.C. Think Tank
- Linked in Latin America
- Facilitating a ‘family affair’
- Nico Ravanilla retreats to Oxford for research
- 2016 alumni remember their first year in the real world
- Pioneering international excellence
- Research at the border: A living laboratory of transformation